Case Name (Year) Popular Name Core Issue / Theme Relevant Article(s) Key Judicial Principle / Doctrine Judgement Constitutional / Legal Impact Romesh Thappar vs. State of Madras (1950) Cross Roads case Freedom of press and circulation of ideas Article 19(1)(a), Article 19(2) Freedom of circulation Court held that freedom of speech and expression includes freedom…
– Cryptocurrency Trading and Article 19(1)(g) Background of the Case In April 2018, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued a circular directing → Banks and regulated financial institutions → Not to deal in virtual currencies (VCs) → And not to provide services to individuals or businesses dealing in VCs Although: The circular was challenged…
– Criminalisation of Politics and Party Accountability Background of the Case Despite a series of earlier judgments—such as: ……the number of candidates with criminal antecedents contesting elections continued to rise. The Court noted a critical problem: This case was heard against that backdrop. Core Constitutional Concern How can democracy be protected when political parties repeatedly…
– Internet Shutdowns and Fundamental Rights Background of the Case Following the abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019, the Union Government imposed: Anuradha Bhasin, Executive Editor of Kashmir Times, challenged these restrictions, arguing that: Core Constitutional Questions Supreme Court’s Judgement The Supreme Court delivered a rights-sensitive yet security-conscious ruling. (a) Internet Is Protected Under…
– Ayodhya Land Dispute Background of the Case The dispute concerned 2.77 acres of land in Ayodhya, where: The litigation history spanned: In 2010, the Allahabad High Court → Divided the land into three equal parts→ Ram Lalla Virajman→ Nirmohi Akhara→ UP Sunni Central Waqf Board All parties appealed to the Supreme Court. Core Legal…
– Decriminalisation of Homosexuality Background of the Case Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, a colonial-era provision, criminalised “carnal intercourse against the order of nature”. Although rarely enforced, it had devastating consequences: The matter was reopened after the Puttaswamy (2017) judgement recognised privacy, dignity, and autonomy as Fundamental Rights. Core Constitutional Questions Supreme Court’s…
– Decriminalisation of Adultery Background of the Case Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) criminalised adultery, but in a deeply unequal manner: Joseph Shine challenged this provision as being → Discriminatory, Archaic, Incompatible with constitutional values Core Constitutional Questions Supreme Court’s Judgement A five-judge Constitution Bench delivered a unanimous verdict. (a) Section 497…
– Sabarimala Temple Entry Background of the Case The Sabarimala Temple in Kerala had a long-standing practice of: This exclusion was enforced through → Rule 3(b) of the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Rules, 1965 The practice was challenged as being:→ Discriminatory→ Violative of women’s dignity and equality Core Constitutional Questions…
– Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Right Background of the Case The case arose in the context of challenges to the Aadhaar scheme, where the Union Government argued that → The Constitution does not recognise a fundamental right to privacy This contention relied on two old Supreme Court judgments: Given the wide constitutional ramifications,…
– Triple Talaq and Constitutional Equality Background of the Case Shayara Bano, a Muslim woman, was divorced by her husband through talaq-e-biddat (instant triple talaq). She challenged the practice on the grounds that it: The case brought into focus the tension between →Personal laws and Fundamental Rights Core Constitutional Questions Supreme Court’s Judgement A five-judge…
