The Nationalists and the First World War
Context:
- World War I (1914–1918):
- Allies → Britain, France, Italy, Russia, Japan, USA.
- Central Powers → Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey.
- For India, the war meant:
- A chance for nationalists to press their demands.
- A chance for revolutionaries to exploit Britain’s difficulties.
🔹 Initial Support of Indian Nationalists
- Leaders like Lokamanya Tilak and later Annie Besant initially supported the British war effort.
- Why? Not out of loyalty, but out of a political calculation:
- They hoped Britain would reward India’s support with self-government (Swaraj).
- But this was a mistaken belief — because the war was being fought for colonial preservation, not liberty.
👉 Lesson: Indian moderates miscalculated. Revolutionaries, however, saw the war as the right opportunity to strike at the British.
🔥 The Ghadar Movement
Formation (1913)
- Indian revolutionaries in USA and Canada founded the Ghadar Party (meaning Rebellion).
- Composition: Mainly Punjabi Sikh peasants and ex-soldiers who had emigrated for work but faced:
- Harsh racial discrimination.
- Restrictive immigration laws.
🌍 Background
- Punjabi immigration to Pacific Coast (North America) since 1904.
- Local hostility and racist laws convinced them they must organise politically.
👉 They noticed a double standard:
- British encouraged Indians to migrate to places like Fiji (for plantation labour),
- But discouraged migration to North America, fearing exposure to ideas of liberty and equality.
📢 Early Activities
đź“° Revolutionary Journalism
- Tarak Nath Das: Started Free Hindustan (Vancouver).
- G.D. Kumar: Started Swadesh Sevak in Gurmukhi, urging social reform and even revolt by Indian soldiers.
🏠Organisations
- Swadesh Sewak Home (1909, Vancouver) → Hostel + meeting point for revolutionaries (like India House in London).
- United India House (1910, Seattle, USA) → Started by Das & Kumar. Weekly lectures given to Indian labourers about freedom.
🤝 Connections
- Built ties with Khalsa Diwan Society (a Sikh reform and political organisation).
- In 1913, decided to send a deputation to London and India:
- Failed to meet British Colonial Secretary.
- But met the Viceroy and Punjab Lieutenant Governor.
- Their Punjab tour became a mass awareness campaign, attracting press support and public enthusiasm.
🔥 Arrival of Bhagwan Singh (1913)
- A Sikh priest from Hong Kong & Malaya, came to Vancouver.
- Openly preached violent overthrow of British rule.
- His fiery speeches created such an impact that:
- He was expelled from Canada within 3 months.
- But his revolutionary message deeply influenced the Sikh migrants.
🌍 The Ghadar Party and Its Revolutionary Attempt
Towards Organisation (1913)
- Indian immigrants in North America felt the need for a central body and strong leadership.
- They found their leader in Lala Har Dayal, a brilliant intellectual, political exile, and Stanford lecturer.
- In May 1913, the Hindi Association was formed in Portland → later renamed Hindustan Ghadar Party.
- Key leaders:
- Baba Sohan Singh Bhakna → President.
- Lala Har Dayal → General Secretary.
- Pandit Kanshi Ram Maroli → Treasurer.
- HQ → Yugantar Ashram, San Francisco.
- Started a weekly paper Ghadar (Revolt), funded by $10,000 contributions from the community.
👉 Ideology: Strongly secular. Despite being mostly Punjabi Sikhs, they declared:
“We were not Sikhs or Punjabis. Our religion was patriotism.” – Sohan Singh Bhakna
👉 Presence: Members spread across Canada, USA, Mexico, Japan, Malaya, Singapore, Thailand, Indo-China, East & South Africa.
đź“° Launching of Ghadar (1913)
- First issue: 1 November 1913 (in Urdu), followed by Gurmukhi edition.
- Motto: “Angrezi Raj ka Dushman” (Enemy of British Rule).
- Each issue had: “Angrezi Raj ka Kacha Chittha” → 14 points exposing British exploitation.
- Wide circulation: Reached immigrant communities worldwide and even India.
- Poems compiled in Ghadar ki Goonj → sung at meetings, spreading revolutionary passion.
🔥 Turning Points in 1914
1. Lala Har Dayal’s Arrest
- Arrested in March 1914 (ostensibly for anarchism, but clearly at Britain’s behest).
- Released on bail, escaped to Switzerland.
- His removal was a blow, but the movement survived.
2. Komagata Maru Incident (1914)
- Gurdit Singh, a contractor from Singapore, chartered a Japanese ship Komagata Maru with 376 Indian passengers.
- Goal: Bypass racist Canadian “continuous journey” law (which made direct entry from India impossible).
- Ghadar activists met the ship, gave lectures and literature.
- But:
- Canadian press warned of “Asiatic invasion.”
- The ship was blocked, police cordoned it off.
- Despite campaigns by Husain Rahim, Sohan Lal Pathak, Balwant Singh (Vancouver) and Barkatullah, Bhagwan Singh, Ram Chandra (USA), the ship was forced back.
- When it reached Calcutta, police provoked a clash → 18 killed, 202 arrested.
- Result: Deep resentment, and further radicalisation.
3. Outbreak of World War I (August 1914)
- Britain’s weakness = opportunity.
- Ghadar Party issued Ailan-e-Jung (Proclamation of War).
- Thousands of emigrants decided to sail back to India.
- Funds poured in; men sold land, gave lifelong savings.
- Contacts built with Indian soldiers in Far East, Southeast Asia, and India.
⚔️ The Final Push (1914–15)
Return to Punjab
- Government carefully screened returnees, but many slipped through.
- Kartar Singh Sarabha, a 19-year-old student from USA and sub-editor of Ghadar, emerged as a fiery organiser.
- He toured villages, distributed literature, mobilised youth and emigrants.
👉 But: Punjab peasants were cautious, not ready for such a “romantic adventure.”
Attempts at Revolt
- Focus shifted to Indian soldiers.
- November 1914: First attempt at mutiny → failed due to poor organisation.
- February 1915: A more organised revolt planned under Rash Behari Bose (who had led the 1912 Hardinge Bomb attempt).
- Revolt date fixed for 21 February 1915.
- But: British intelligence infiltrated → plans betrayed.
- Regiments disbanded, leaders arrested.
- 12 men of the 23rd Cavalry executed.
👉 Rash Behari Bose escaped (later fled to Japan). But most leaders were caught.
❌ Collapse of the Ghadar Movement
- Brutal repression: mass arrests, executions, imprisonments.
- Kartar Singh Sarabha was hanged at age 19 → became a symbol of sacrifice.
- By mid-1915, the movement inside India was crushed.
✨ Significance
- Ghadar was the first truly international revolutionary movement for Indian independence.
- It was secular, modern, and uncompromising in its goal of armed struggle.
- Though it failed, it inspired later revolutionaries (Bhagat Singh regarded Sarabha as his guru).
- It showed the potential of diaspora nationalism, linking India with Indians abroad.
👉 So, the Ghadar story ends in tragedy but leaves behind a legacy of sacrifice and revolutionary fervour.
🌍 The Repression of the Ghadar Movement
Brutal Crackdown
- In Punjab, the British unleashed mass arrests and trials.
- Results:
- 42 Ghadarites hanged
- 114 transported for life (sent to Andamans, etc.)
- 93 imprisoned for long terms
- Some leaders, after release, went on to found Kirti movement and later played roles in the Communist movement in Punjab.
👉 Prominent Ghadarites: Baba Gurmukh Singh, Kartar Singh Sarabha, Sohan Singh Bhakna, Rahmat Ali Shah, Bhai Parmanand, Mohammad Barkatullah.
Mutiny in Singapore (1915)
- Inspired by Ghadarites, 700 men of the 5th Light Infantry revolted on 15 February 1915.
- Leaders: Jamadar Chisti Khan and Subedar Dundey Khan.
- Suppressed after a bitter battle.
- Punishment:
- 37 executed publicly
- 41 transported for life
👉 Shows how far the revolutionary wave spread — even Indian soldiers in Singapore were influenced.
🔎 Analysis of the Ghadar Movement
Many ask: Was the Ghadar Movement a failure because it did not overthrow British rule?
- If yes, then even Non-Cooperation (1920–22), Civil Disobedience (1930–34), and Quit India (1942) would be “failures,” because none immediately delivered freedom.
- But historically, we judge movements by their impact on national consciousness, not just immediate results.
By this standard, Ghadar was a landmark.
✨ Achievements of the Ghadar Movement
- Popularising Nationalist Ideology
- Spread the understanding that British rule = root cause of poverty and backwardness.
- Did this not just in India, but among Indians abroad.
- Creating a Cadre of Nationalists
- Built a strong, motivated group of revolutionaries.
- Many later helped in peasant struggles and leftist movements in Punjab.
- Egalitarian & Democratic Ideology
- Called for an independent republic in India.
- Ideals: equality, democracy, anti-exploitation.
- Secular Outlook
- Though mostly Sikh peasants, they welcomed Hindus, Muslims, Bengalis.
- Leaders: Har Dayal (Hindu), Barkatullah (Muslim), Rash Behari Bose (Bengali Hindu).
- Rejected colonial labels like “martial race.”
- Patriotism = true religion.
- Counteracting Communalism
- Rejected Hindu-Muslim divisions.
- Popularised Bande Mataram as a unifying slogan, not sectarian greetings.
- Rallying Cry for Nationalism
- Created a culture of sacrifice, fearlessness, and unity.
- Inspired later revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh (who called Kartar Singh Sarabha his “guru”).
⚠️ Weaknesses of the Ghadar Movement
- Overestimation of Readiness
- Called for revolt too soon, without adequate preparation.
- Misleading Response from Abroad
- Punjabi migrants in USA/Canada were fired up because of racism → Ghadar leaders assumed Indians back home were equally ready. But in reality, the masses in Punjab were not prepared for a sudden armed rebellion.
- Underestimation of British Power
- Believed a single call to action could spark mutiny and mass uprising.
- Did not grasp the deeply entrenched military-administrative machinery of the Raj.
- Heavy Costs
- Brutal suppression removed a whole generation of committed revolutionaries.
- If these leaders had survived, they might have checked communal tendencies that later divided the movement.
🌟 Conclusion
The Ghadar Movement was not a failure — it was a torchbearer of militant nationalism, laying down traditions of:
- Secularism
- Equality
- Sacrifice
- Globalised struggle
It did not win independence in 1915, but it kept the flame alive, ensured that the idea of freedom through sacrifice survived, and inspired future generations.
🌟 Tilak’s Return (1914): A Changed Leader
After six years in Mandalay Jail (Burma), Tilak returned in June 1914, transformed:
- Secular Approach:
- His speeches dropped religious appeals.
- Defined alienness not by religion but by conflicting interests.
- Quote: “If someone helps the people in this country, whether they are Muslim or English, they are not an alien.”
- Inclusivity:
- Opposed linguistic chauvinism → supported education in vernacular languages.
- Linked Swaraj with the idea of linguistic states.
- Against Untouchability:
- “If a god were to tolerate untouchability, I would not recognise him as God.”
- Rejected caste bias:
- Urged Brahmins not to resist non-Brahmin demands.
- Urged non-Brahmins to see their problems not as Brahmin oppression but as unequal access to education.
👉 Tilak had clearly matured into a nationalist statesman, broad, secular, and inclusive.
🏛 Lucknow Session of the Congress (1916)
- Presided by Ambica Charan Mazumdar.
- First Congress session attended by Gandhiji after his return from South Africa (1915).
Reunion of Moderates and Extremists
- The Surat Split (1907) had benefited the British:
- Extremists were crushed.
- Moderates ignored with half-hearted reforms.
- After Tilak’s release (1914), many leaders realised unity was essential.
Efforts by Tilak
- Focused on re-entry of Extremists into INC.
- Reassured Moderates and government:
- “We seek administrative reforms, not overthrow of government.”
- Declared loyalty to the Crown, condemned violence.
Efforts by Annie Besant
- Inspired by the Irish Home Rule model.
- Urged Moderates to accept Extremists back.
- By 1915, launched separate campaigns through newspapers and associations.
Moderates’ Shift
- After Pherozeshah Mehta’s death (1915), opposition to Extremists weakened.
- By 1915 Congress session, Extremists were readmitted.
- Finally, at Lucknow (1916), Moderates and Extremists reunited.
🤝 The Lucknow Pact (1916)
This was the most dramatic outcome of the Lucknow session — the Congress and Muslim League came together for the first time.
Why Unity?
- Though ideologically different, both sides wanted constitutional reforms from Britain.
- Tilak and Mohammad Ali Jinnah played key roles in bridging divides.
- Annie Besant also worked behind the scenes.
- Sarojini Naidu hailed Jinnah as the “Ambassador of Hindu-Muslim Unity.”
Demands
- More constitutional reforms.
- 50% Indians in the Viceroy’s and Governors’ Executive Councils.
Separate Electorates
- Both Congress and League jointly accepted separate electorates for Muslims.
- Seen as:
- A gesture to reassure minorities of protection.
- But also a dangerous precedent, as it reinforced communal divisions.
🌟 Importance of the Lucknow Pact
- Political Unity: First and only time Congress and League worked together wholeheartedly.
- Hindu-Muslim Unity: Marked a new high point, creating hope for joint struggle.
- Communalism’s Entry: By conceding separate electorates, Congress inadvertently strengthened communal politics.
👉 So, the Lucknow Pact was both a milestone of unity and a seed of future division.
âś… In short:
- Tilak returned as a more inclusive and secular leader.
- Extremists and Moderates were reunited.
- Congress and League came together under the Lucknow Pact (1916) — a rare but short-lived moment of Hindu-Muslim unity.
Indian Home Rule Movement (1916–1918)
🌍 Background: Why Home Rule, Why Now?
- World War I (1914–18) created new political openings.
- Indian leaders realised: Britain would not grant reforms voluntarily unless there was widespread public pressure.
- Learning from the Irish Home Rule Movement, Tilak and Annie Besant launched parallel but coordinated campaigns in 1916.
- Objective: Self-government (Home Rule) within the British Commonwealth — not full independence yet, but an Indian-run government under British suzerainty.
🔹 Tilak’s Home Rule League (April 1916)
- Founded at the Bombay Provincial Conference, Belgaum. HQ: Poona.
- Area: Maharashtra (excluding Bombay city), Karnataka, Central Provinces, and Berar.
- Tilak toured villages, explained Home Rule in vernacular languages, and tied Swaraj with linguistic states.
- Famous slogan: “Home Rule is my birthright, and I shall have it.”
- By April 1917 → membership: 14,000+.
- Defended by Jinnah in a sedition case; acquittal gave legitimacy to the movement.
Annie Besant’s Home Rule League (September 1916)
- Annie Besant (theosophist, educationist, social reformer) → deeply influenced by Irish nationalism.
- HQ: Adyar, Madras. Organising Secretary: George Arundale.
- Area: Rest of India (including Bombay city).
- Loosely organised but wide: 200 branches by 1917.
- Publications: New India and Commonweal.
- Supporters included: Jawaharlal Nehru (Allahabad), B. Chakravarti, J. Banerjee (Calcutta).
- By March 1917 → membership: 7,000.
🔹 Joint Effort
- At the end of the Lucknow Session (1916), both leagues held a joint convention → 1,000+ delegates, addressed by Tilak & Besant.
- Spread political education: libraries, pamphlets, study circles, village meetings, student classes, fundraising.
🔥 Government Repression & People’s Response
- 1917: Besant, Arundale, B.P. Wadia arrested → massive protests nationwide.
- S. Subramania Aiyar renounced his knighthood.
- Jinnah, Surendranath Banerjee, Madan Mohan Malaviya joined movement.
- Tilak advocated passive resistance / civil disobedience if detainees weren’t freed.
- Gandhi proposed: collect signatures of 1,000 men willing to defy internment orders → symbolic step toward later satyagraha.
🏛 Change in British Attitude
- Secretary of State Edwin Montagu’s declaration (August 1917):
Policy of His Majesty’s Government is the gradual development of self-governing institutions with the ultimate goal of responsible government in India.
- A distinct advance from Morley (1909), who had denied self-government as a goal.
- Annie Besant released (Sept 1917). Later became Congress President (1917, Calcutta session) — first Englishwoman to hold this post.
📉 Decline of the Movement (1918 onwards)
- Moderates withdrew support → satisfied with Montagu’s promise.
- Besant vacillated → sometimes rejected reforms, sometimes urged acceptance.
- Tilak left for England (1918) to fight a libel case (Valentine Chirol’s Indian Unrest) → leadership weakened.
- Post-war → Gandhi’s rise shifted focus to mass satyagraha.
- In 1920, Gandhi took over the All India Home Rule League, renamed it Swarajya Sabha, and merged it into Congress.
🌟 Achievements of the Home Rule Movement
- Kept the spirit of nationalism alive during World War I.
- Popularised the demand for Home Rule/Self-government.
- Used peaceful propaganda and education rather than violence.
- Prepared a network of cadres, study circles, and branches → later crucial for Gandhian movements.
- Made Swaraj a mass slogan, not just an elite aspiration.
- Linked urban intellectuals with rural masses.
✅ In short: The Home Rule Leagues were transitional bridges — between the early 1900s Extremist-Moderate phase and Gandhi’s 1920s mass satyagrahas. They gave Swaraj a practical organisational shape and a powerful emotional slogan.
