Successor States UPSC | Mughal Decline & Rise of Powers

(Understanding the transition from Subahs to Sovereignties)

🔍 What are Successor States?

Let us begin with a basic premise: the Mughal Empire in its prime had created an elaborate, centrally controlled provincial structure. However, as the empire weakened in the late 17th and early 18th centuries, that structure started breaking away, and provincial governors began asserting independence.

These breakaway provinces came to be known as Successor States — so called because they succeeded or replaced Mughal authority in their respective regions.

📌 Key Characteristics of Successor States

Origins in Mughal Provinces (Subahs):
Provinces like Hyderabad, Awadh, and Bengal were not newly formed territories. These were earlier parts of the Mughal Subah system, governed directly by imperial appointments.
Assertion of Independence:
With the center becoming weak, provincial governors stopped obeying Delhi, started collecting revenues independently, and established dynastic rules in their provinces.
Transition through Two Phases:
- Autonomy Phase: Mughal Subahs gradually became self-ruling states.
- Subjugation Phase: These very states were later conquered or subordinated to the British colonial system.
Tributary Relationship with the Mughals:
The only remaining link with the Mughal center was the ritual of tribute — a nominal payment to maintain the illusion of loyalty. This was more ceremonial than real.

🧩 Understanding the Mughal Provincial Setup (Background)

To fully grasp the concept of successor states, we need to recall how the Mughal provincial administration worked.

🗺️ Structure of Mughal Subahs

Under Akbar’s administrative reforms, the empire was divided into Subahs (provinces).
Each Subah was governed by a Subahdar, also called a Nazim, appointed directly by the emperor.
By the time of Aurangzeb, the number of Subahs had grown to 22.
Some notable Subahs included:
- Golkonda (Hyderabad)
- Carnatic
- Bengal
- Avadh

🛡️ Dual Administrative Structure in Provinces

Each province had two key heads:

Nizamat (Law and Order):
- Headed by the Subahdar or Nazim
- Responsible for criminal justice, policing, and general governance
Diwani (Revenue Administration):
- Headed by the Diwan, appointed by the emperor
- Managed land revenue, finance, and records
- Also served as a check on the Nazim’s power

This structure created a system of checks and balances to prevent any single official from gaining complete control.

📉 Collapse of Imperial Control

Over time:

Emperor’s control over appointments weakened
Governors abolished the Diwani office in their regions
Provincial rulers no longer sent regular tributes
Thus, de facto independence replaced nominal subordination

🏰 Hyderabad

👑 Foundation by Nizam-ul-Mulk Asaf Jah (1724)

The state of Hyderabad was established by Asaf Jah I, also known as Nizam-ul-Mulk, in 1724.
He was one of the most influential nobles in the Mughal court after Aurangzeb’s death.
Initially, he helped Emperor Muhammad Shah remove the powerful Saiyid Brothers and was rewarded with the Subah of Deccan.

📜 Nizam’s Rise to Power

Between 1720–1722, he:

Suppressed local opposition
Streamlined the administration
Was even appointed as the Wazir (Prime Minister) of the Mughal Empire in 1722
→ But due to repeated interference from Emperor Muhammad Shah, he resigned and returned to the Deccan.

By 1724, he formally founded the Hyderabad State, although he never declared open rebellion against the Mughal throne.

🧠 Governance under Nizam-ul-Mulk

Followed a policy of religious tolerance, particularly towards Hindus
Kept zamindars under control
Reformed revenue systems
Established a well-organised administration

While he maintained nominal loyalty to the Mughal Empire, he functioned like an independent ruler in practice.

🎯 This is a classic example of de facto independence under de jure loyalty.

⚔️ Decline Begins After His Death (1748)

After Asaf Jah’s death, succession disputes erupted.
His son Nasir Jung and grandson Muzaffar Jung began competing for the throne.
This internal conflict invited external intervention.

🏴‍☠️ Role of Foreign Powers: Entry of the French

Joseph François Dupleix, the French Governor in India, intervened in the succession battle.
Dupleix supported Muzaffar Jung, who in return granted the French territorial and financial benefits.
This was one of the early examples of European involvement in Indian internal politics.

🧠 Analytical Insight: Why is Hyderabad Important?

It was the first clear case of a Mughal province becoming a self-governed, dynastic state.
Set the template for other successor states like Bengal and Awadh.
Illustrates how weakening central authority combined with local ambition led to fragmentation.
Also shows how European powers began using these divisions to their advantage — a pattern that would accelerate across the 18th century.

🧾 Timeline of Hyderabad’s Nizams (1724–1948)

Nizam	Reign	Key Notes
Nizam-ul-Mulk Asaf Jah I	1724–1748	Founder of Hyderabad State
Nasir Jung	1748–1750	Son of Asaf Jah, involved in succession struggle
Muzaffar Jung	1750–1751	Supported by the French
Salabat Jung	1751–1762	Puppet ruler under French influence
Osman Ali Khan	1911–1948	Last Nizam; ruled until Hyderabad merged with India

🏰 Carnatic: From Mughal Subah to British Annexation

(A study of succession, European intervention, and colonial consolidation)

🗺️ Geopolitical Background: What was Carnatic?

The Carnatic region was part of the Mughal Deccan, located along the southeastern coast of India (present-day Tamil Nadu).
Originally under the Nizam of Hyderabad, the region was governed through a Deputy Governor — the Nawab of Carnatic.

However, over time, this deputy governor:

Asserted autonomy
Made his position hereditary
Functioned independently from the Nizam

🧠 This mirrors the pattern seen in other successor states — local governors slowly sever ties with the Mughal centre and claim sovereignty.

👑 The Rise of an Independent Nawabship

A turning point came during the rule of Saadatullah Khan (1710–1732):

He made his nephew, Dost Ali, his successor without the Nizam’s approval.
This act formally marked the beginning of independent dynastic rule in the Carnatic.

But after 1740, political instability increased due to:

Repeated succession disputes
Rivalries within the ruling family
Increasing intervention by European trading companies

⚔️ European Involvement in the Carnatic

The power vacuum and conflicts in the Carnatic gave an entry point to European powers — particularly the French and the British.

🧨 The Ambur Conspiracy (1749)

Chanda Sahib, son-in-law of Dost Ali, conspired against Nawab Anwar-ud-din.
He formed a secret alliance with Dupleix (French Governor-General in India).
In the Battle of Ambur, Anwar-ud-din was killed and Chanda Sahib became Nawab, supported by the French.

🤝 British Response

Anwar-ud-din’s son, Muhammad Ali, fled and sought British support.
In 1752, the British defeated Chanda Sahib and installed Muhammad Ali as the Nawab.
Thus began British dominance in Carnatic politics, pushing the French into retreat.

👑 Carnatic Nawabs — Phases of Political Control

Here’s how the Nawabs transitioned from imperial appointees to British dependents:

1. Appointed by the Mughal Emperor

Nawab	Rule	Role
Zulfiqar Khan	1692–1703	First Mughal-appointed Nawab of Carnatic
Daud Khan Panni	1703–1710	Mughal commander; maintained central authority
Saadatullah Khan	1710–1732	Asserted independence; made post hereditary

2. Independent Nawabs (Self-Declared Rulers)

Nawab	Rule	Key Events
Dost Ali Khan	1732–1740	Saadatullah’s nephew; appointed without Nizam’s consent
Anwar-ud-din Khan	1744–1749	Killed in Battle of Ambur
Chanda Sahib	1749–1752	Supported by French; briefly Nawab

3. Nawabs Under British Influence

Nawab	Rule	Highlights
Muhammad Ali Khan	1752–1795	Installed by British; strong EIC ally
Umdat-ul-Umara	1795–1801	Suspected of aiding Tipu Sultan

4. Nawabs as British Protectorates

Nawab	Rule	Highlights
Azim-ud-Daula	1801–1819	Signed Carnatic Treaty; lost all administrative control
Azam Jah	1819–1825	Titular ruler with no real power
Ghulam Muhammad Ghouse Khan	1825–1855	Last Nawab; died without heir; territory annexed via Doctrine of Lapse

📜 Key Events in Carnatic’s Decline

🧱 Muhammad Ali Khan (1752–1795)

Supported entirely by the British East India Company.
His reign marked the high point of British influence in Carnatic.
Built the Chepauk Palace in 1768 and shifted the capital from Arcot to Chepauk (Chennai).

🎯 This change symbolised growing proximity to the British-controlled Fort St. George.

⚖️ Umdat-ul-Umara (1795–1801)

Suspected of secretly supporting Tipu Sultan during the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War (1799).
After Tipu’s fall, the British demanded control of Carnatic administration as compensation.
Umdat-ul-Umara resisted, worsening tensions with the British.

🖋️ Azim-ud-Daula and the Carnatic Treaty (1801)

Upon succession, Azim-ud-Daula was forced by Lord Wellesley to sign the Carnatic Treaty:
- Ceded all civil and military powers to the British.
- In return, he received one-fifth of the state’s revenue.
- Became a puppet ruler — Nawab in name only.

🚫 Ghulam Muhammad Ghouse Khan & the End (1825–1855)

Ruled as a ceremonial Nawab under British supervision.
Died in 1855 without a male heir.
British annexed Carnatic using the Doctrine of Lapse — a policy that allowed them to annex any princely state without a natural heir.

📌 This marked the formal end of Carnatic as a political entity and its full integration into British India.

🕌 Awadh: A Regional Power in 18th Century North India

Introduction: The Rise of Awadh

After the decline of centralized Mughal authority in the early 18th century, several regions began asserting political autonomy. One of the most important and prosperous of these was Awadh (Avadh) — strategically located in the Gangetic plains, with Lucknow eventually emerging as a cultural and political hub.

The foundation of Awadh as an autonomous polity reflects the classic post-Mughal pattern: a Mughal-appointed Subahdar gradually turning into an independent hereditary ruler, all while formally acknowledging the Mughal emperor’s supremacy.

🧭 Timeline of Nawabs of Awadh

Nawab	Reign	Key Contributions / Events
Saadat Khan	1722–1739	Founder of autonomous Awadh; revenue reforms
Safdar Jang	1739–1754	Alliance with Peshwa; expansion into Allahabad
Shuja-ud-Daula	1754–1775	Battle of Buxar (1764); became dependent on the EIC
Saadat Ali Khan II	1798–1814	Signed Subsidiary Alliance (1801)
Wajid Ali Shah	1847–1856	Last Nawab; Awadh annexed by British (1856)

👑 Saadat Khan Burhan-ul-Mulk (1722–1739)

Appointed as Subahdar of Awadh by the Mughal emperor in 1722.
Took effective steps to establish a strong, stable and autonomous administration.
Suppressed rebellious zamindars, brought order to the province, and ensured efficient revenue collection.
Implemented equitable land revenue policies that protected peasants and improved agricultural productivity.
His administration was known for having disciplined troops and a sound financial base.
Before his death in 1739, Awadh had become virtually independent, with power passing to his nephew, Safdar Jang.

👑 Safdar Jang (1739–1754)

Continued Saadat Khan’s legacy by expanding Awadh’s territory and suppressing disorder.
Captured Rohtas and Chunar forts, and extended his domain into Allahabad.
Ensured a period of peace and prosperity in Awadh — the zenith of its regional autonomy.

🛡️ As Mughal Wazir (1748–1753)

Appointed Wazir of the Mughal Empire and granted Allahabad as a jagir.
Signed a critical agreement with the Peshwa (1752):
- Peshwa would defend the Mughal Empire from Ahmad Shah Abdali, Rajput Rajas, and Indian Pathans.
- In return, the Peshwa was promised:
  - ₹50 lakh
  - Chauth rights in Punjab, Sindh, Multan, Rajputana, Rohilkhand
  - Governorship of Ajmer and Agra

⚠️ However, the agreement failed — the Peshwa later allied with Safdar Jang’s rivals in Delhi.

👑 Shuja-ud-Daula (1754–1775)

Son of Safdar Jang and successor as Nawab of Awadh.
Also served as Wazir of the Mughal Empire (1760).

⚔️ Battle of Panipat (1761)

Sided with Ahmad Shah Abdali against the Marathas.
His support helped prevent Maratha dominance in North India temporarily.

⚔️ Battle of Buxar (1764)

Formed a triple alliance with Shah Alam II and Mir Qasim against the English East India Company.
Defeated by the British — leading to:
- Loss of military and political autonomy
- Signing of a defensive alliance that made him dependent on the EIC

👑 Saadat Ali Khan II (1798–1814)

Signed the Subsidiary Alliance Treaty in 1801 under pressure from Lord Wellesley.
This marked the beginning of British political control over Awadh.
Nawabs lost independence in foreign policy and had to maintain British troops at their expense.

👑 Wajid Ali Shah (1847–1856)

The last Nawab of Awadh.
Accused of misgovernance by the British, and Awadh was annexed in 1856 under Lord Dalhousie’s Doctrine of Lapse (though technically on grounds of maladministration).
This annexation was a major cause of resentment, contributing to the outbreak of the Revolt of 1857.

🏛️ Lucknow: Cultural Bloom under Nawabs

The Nawabi period, especially under Shuja-ud-Daula and Wajid Ali Shah, saw the flowering of a distinct Lucknowi culture.
Lucknow became:
- A rival to Delhi in terms of poetry, music, dance (Kathak), and literature
- A centre of fine textiles and handicrafts like chikankari embroidery
Courtly culture emphasized refinement, etiquette, and aesthetic sensibility, often associated with the “Tehzeeb of Awadh”.

💰 Economic and Strategic Significance of Awadh

Economically: Fertile Gangetic plains → strong agrarian base and thriving trade
Geographically:
- Located between Delhi and Bengal
- Acted as a buffer zone and had strategic significance for both the Mughals and the British

✅ Legacy of Awadh

The history of Awadh is a microcosm of 18th-century India — where regional powers flourished, navigated shifting alliances, and eventually fell under British colonial domination. While the Nawabs of Awadh gradually lost political autonomy, their contribution to Indian culture, especially through Lucknow’s unique courtly traditions, remains significant to this day.

🧭 Bengal under the Nawabs (1717–1765)

(A Transition from Autonomy to Subjugation)

🌾 From Mughal Subedari to Independent Rule

Let’s begin with a historical context.

The Mughal Empire was already showing signs of decline by the early 18th century. Provincial governors—Subedars—across India began asserting autonomy. One such province was Bengal, a rich, fertile, and economically significant region. The story of Bengal from 1717 to 1765 is the story of its gradual autonomy, administrative innovations, economic reforms, and eventual fall to the British East India Company (EIC).

🔑 Important Nawabs of Bengal (1717–1765)

Nawab	Reign	Key Developments
Murshid Quli Khan	1717–1727	Agricultural loans (Taccavi); Financial reforms; De facto independence from Mughals
Sarfaraz Khan	1727 (few days) & 1739–1740	Successor of Murshid Quli; removed twice
Shuja-ud-din	1727–1739	Ran administration independently but sent tribute to Delhi
Alivardi Khan	1740–1756	Ended Mughal influence; faced Maratha invasions; ceded Orissa
Siraj-ud-Daulah	1756–1757	Lost Battle of Plassey to the British
Mir Jafar	1757–1760, 1763–1765	Puppet Nawab; granted trade rights to EIC
Mir Qasim	1760–1763	Tried to reform but lost Battle of Buxar
Nizam-ud-Daulah	1765–1766	Formal Treaty with British—decline complete

🧠 Murshid Quli Khan: Architect of Bengal’s Autonomy

Initially appointed Diwan of Bengal (1700) and later the Governor (Subedar) in 1717 by the Mughal Emperor.
Though a Mughal appointee, he acted independently, and only sent nominal tribute to Delhi.
He was the last governor directly appointed by the Mughal emperor; after him, the Nawabship became hereditary.
He nominated Sarfaraz Khan (his daughter’s son) as his successor—marking the beginning of dynastic rule.

🔧 Administrative & Revenue Reforms

Murshid Quli Khan took significant steps to boost Bengal’s financial capacity:

Jagirs into Khalisah: Converted large tracts of land from jagirs (revenue assignments) into khalisah (direct crown lands) to ensure better revenue collection.
Revenue Farming System: Introduced Ijara, where the right to collect revenue was auctioned to the highest bidder. While effective fiscally, this burdened peasants.
Taccavi Loans: Offered agricultural loans to poor cultivators, enabling them to invest in crops and pay land revenue on time.
Zamindari Policy: Suppressed rebellious zamindars while rewarding loyal ones who could efficiently collect revenue.

🧭 Shuja-ud-din & Sarfaraz: Interim Continuity

Murshid Quli’s nominee Sarfaraz was deposed by Shuja-ud-din, his father.
Shuja-ud-din ruled independently but maintained Mughal etiquette by sending regular tribute.
After his death, Sarfaraz returned, but his rule was short-lived—killed by Alivardi Khan in 1740.

⚔️ Alivardi Khan: Defender of Autonomy

Killed Sarfaraz and seized power in 1740, without Mughal sanction.
Two decisive actions severed ties with the Mughal centre:
- Appointed officials without consulting Delhi.
- Stopped tribute to the Mughal emperor.

🏇 Conflict with the Marathas

Faced frequent Maratha invasions (1742–1751), led by Balaji Baji Rao.
Finally, signed a peace treaty in 1751:
- Paid ₹12 lakh annually in lieu of Chauth.
- Ceded Orissa to the Marathas.
This weakened Bengal’s strategic control and exposed it to external threats.

🌱 Bengal’s Growth under Independent Nawabs

Despite political shifts, Bengal under Murshid Quli, Shuja-ud-din, and Alivardi prospered economically and socially:

Law & Order: Long periods of peace and administrative stability.
Social Harmony: Equal employment opportunities for Hindus and Muslims.
Trade Regulation: Strict control over European trading companies, especially the British and French.
Sovereignty Asserted: Nawabs resisted pressure to allow fortification of foreign settlements.

⚠️ Strategic Failures: Why Bengal Fell

Neglect of Military Strength: Nawabs focused more on administration than military modernization.
Underestimated British Aggression:
- Didn’t anticipate British expansionism, disguised as trade.
- Failed to counter the English EIC’s strategic use of military power.
Frequent Invasions:
- Maratha invasions weakened Bengal’s economy and defence.
- Loss of Orissa (under Alivardi) and Battle of Plassey (1757) under Siraj-ud-Daulah were turning points.

📉 From Independence to Subservience

The fall of Siraj-ud-Daulah in 1757, and the subsequent rise of puppet Nawabs like Mir Jafar and Mir Qasim, led to the political subjugation of Bengal:

Mir Jafar granted free trade rights to the EIC in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa.
Mir Qasim, a reformist, tried to resist the British but lost the Battle of Buxar (1764).
Nizam-ud-Daulah, appointed after Mir Jafar’s second term, signed a treaty with the British, formalizing British control.

By 1765, the Diwani of Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa (i.e., revenue rights) were transferred to the British—ending Bengal’s independence.

🔚 Conclusion: The Rise and Fall of Nawabi Bengal

The Nawabs of Bengal—beginning with Murshid Quli Khan—ushered in an era of financial reform, administrative innovation, and relative prosperity. However, their military weaknesses, underestimation of British ambition, and inability to form strategic alliances led to Bengal’s subordination to the British East India Company. This set the precedent for the Company Rule in India, making Bengal the first Indian province to fall under colonial domination.